THE CARNEGIE FOUNDATION 
FOR THE ADYANCEMENT OF TEACHING 



RULES FOR THE ADMISSION OF INSTITUTIONS 

AND FOR THE GRANTING OF RETIRING 

ALLOWANCES 



1913 



THE CARNEGIE FOUNDATION 
FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING 

• 

RULES FOR THE ADMISSION OF INSTITUTIONS 

AND FOR THE GRANTING OF RETIRING 

ALLOWANCES 




576 FIFTH AVENUE 

NEW YORK CITY 

NOVEMBER, 1913 









D. B. UPDIKE, THE MERRYMOUNT PRESS, BOSTON 



OFFICERS OF ADMINISTRATION 

Henry Smith Pbitchett President 
RoBEiiT A. Franks Treasurer 

Clyde Furst Secretary 



TRUSTEES 



William Peterson 
William Frederick Slocom 
Charles Franklin Thwing 

Hill McClelland Bell 
William Lowe Bryan 
Nicholas Murray Butler 
Thomas Morrison Carnegie 
Edwin Boone Craighead 
William Henry Crawford 
George Hutcheson Denny 
Robert A. Franks 
Arthur Twining Hadley 
Alexander Crombie Humphreys 
Charles Richard 



Chairman 
Vice-Chairman 
Secretary of the Board 

David Starr Jordan 
Henry Churchill King 
Abbott Lawrence Lowell 
Thomas McClelland 
Samuel Black McCormick 
Samuel Plantz 
Henry Smith Pritchett 
Jacob Gould Schurman 
James Monroe Taylor 
Frank Arthur Vandeblip 
Van Hise 



EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 

Henry Smith PRiTCHErr, ex officio 
Nicholas Murray Butler Alexander Crombie Humphreys 

Robert A. Franks Jacob Gould Schurman 

Arthur Twining Hadley Frank Arthur Vanderlip 



RULES FOR THE ADMISSION OF INSTITUTIONS AND FOR THE 
GRANTING OF RETIRING ALLOWANCES 

THE act of incorporation, passed by the Congress of the United States, and 
approved by the President on March 10, 1906, expresses the purpose of the 
Foundation as follows: 

Section 2. That the objects for which said corporation is incorporated shall be — 

(a) To receive and maintain a fund or funds and apply the income thereof as 
follows : 

To provide retiring pensions, without regard to race, sex, creed, or color, for 
the teachers of universities, colleges, and technical schools in the United States, 
the Dominion of Canada, and Newfoundland, who, by reason of long and meri- 
torious service, or by reason of old age, disability, or other sufficient reason, shall 
be deemed entitled to the assistance and aid of this corporation, on such terms 
and conditions, however, as such corporation may from time to time approve 
and adopt : Provided, however. That the said retiring pensions shall be paid to 
such teachers only as are or have been connected with institutions not under 
control of a sect or which do not require their trastees, their officers, faculties, or 
students (or a majority thereof) to belong to any specified sect, and which do not 
impose any theological test as a condition of entrance therein or of connection 
therewith. 

(b) In general, to do and perform all things necessary to encourage, uphold, 
and dignify the profession of the teacher and the cause of higher education 
within the United States, the Dominion of Canada, and Newfoundland aforesaid, 
and to promote the objects of the Foundation, with full power, however, to the 
trustees hereinafter appointed and their successors from time to time to modify 
the conditions and regulations under which the work shall be carried on, so as 
to secure the application of the funds in the manner best adapted to the con- 
ditions of the time: And provided. That such corporation may by a vote of two- 
thirds of the entire number of trustees enlarge or vary the purposes herein set 
forth, provided that the objects of the corporation shall at all times be among 
the foregoing and kindred thereto. 

The trustees, on May 7, 1908, accepted from Mr. Carnegie an additional endow- 
ment for the purpose of extending the retiring allowance system to tax-supported 
institutions. 

The executive committee, on February 11, 1913, with the approval of the trustees, 
accepted from Mr. Carnegie an additional gift for the independent endowment of a 
Division of Educational Enquiry. 

The following rules have been adopted by the trustees. The explanatory matter 
in fine print embodies interpretations of the rules by the executive committee. 



THE ADMISSION OF INSTITUTIONS TO 
THE ASSOCIATED LIST 

Institutions of higher learning, including colleges, technical schools, and universities, 
whose work is clearly of college or university grade, may be admitted to participa- 
tion in the benefits of the retiring allowance system sustained by the Foundation. 

APPLICATIONS 

Applications on behalf of institutions should be made by the board in which the 

government of the institution is vested. 

ACADEMIC STANDING 

In order to be admitted to the retiring allowance system of the Foundation, the es- 
sential work of an institution must be that of higher education, and of such a char- 
acter that gi'aduation from a four-year high school course, or equivalent training, is 
a prerequisite therefor. 

The term "college" is used to designate, in the United States, Canada, and New- 
foundland, institutions varying so widely in requirements for admission, standards 
of instruction, and facilities for work, that for the purposes of this Foundation some 
arbitrary definition of that term is necessary. The following definition, in force in 
the state of New York, will be employed: 

"An institution to be ranked as a college must have at least six (6) professors 
giving their entire time to college and university work, a course of four full years 
in liberal arts and sciences, and should require for admission not less than the 
usual four years of academic or high school preparation, or its equivalent, in 
addition to the pre-academic or gi-ammar school studies." 

A technical school, to be eligible, must have entrance and graduation requirements 
equivalent to those of the college, and must offer courses in pure and applied science 
of equivalent grade. 

No institution wiU be accepted which is so organized that stockholders may par- 
ticipate in its benefits. 

A tax-supported institution must be in receipt of an annual income of not less 
than one hundred thousand dollars. 

An institution not supported by taxation, in order to meet the requirement in 
regard to endowment, must have a productive endowment of not less than two 
hundred thousand dollars over and above any indebtedness of the institution. 

The executive committee has ruled that institutions in other countries than the United States, 
the Dominion of Canada, and Newfoundland are not eligible to participate in the retiring allow- 
ance system (January 19, 1911) ; that institutions whose work is primarily research^ and not teach- 
ing, are not eligible to participate in the retiring allowance system (September 15, 1909) ; that an 
institution which contains a small college of good standards but also a preparatory school, an agri- 
cultural school, or an elementary music school, does not represent with sufficient distinctness and 
clarity the organization and conception of a college to be eligible to participate in the retiring 



RULES • 3 

allowance system (January 20, 1910) ; and that until the financial load which the Foundation has 
assumed is more completely known, additions to the number of associated colleges will be made 
with great caution (November 20, 1912). 

TAX-SUPPORTED INSTITUTIONS 

In the case of tax-supported institutions, the applications must be accompanied by 
the approval of the governor and of the legislature of the state or province in which 
the institution is situated. The trustees of the Foundation reserve the right to de- 
cline the application of any such institution if it is subject to a political control or 
interference which, in the opinion of the trustees of the Foundation, impairs its 
educational efficiency. 

The executive committee has ruled that the Foundation cannot, in lieu of the application of 
the legislature, accept the application of the board of regents of a state university even when by 
the state constitution the board of regents is independent of the legislature in regard to the ac- 
ceptance of endowments and gifts (June 4, 1909) ; and that in admitting state universities con- 
taining colleges of agriculture, these latter colleges are for the present excluded (June 4, 1909). 

UNDENOMINATIONAL TEST 

Institutions of higher learning will be recognized as eligible to the benefits of the 
Foundation, so far as denominational control is involved, under the following con- 
ditions : 

1. Colleges, universities, and technical schools of requisite academic grade, not 
owned or controlled by a religious organization, whose acts of incorporation or char- 
ters specifically provide that no denominational test shall be applied in the choice of 
trustees, officers, or teachers, or in the admission of students. 

2. In the case of colleges, universities, and technical schools, not owned or con- 
trolled by a religious organization, in which no specific statement concerning de- 
nominational tests is made in the charters or acts of incorporation, the trustees of 
such institutions shall be asked to certify by a resolution to the trustees of the Car- 
negie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, that, notwithstanding the lack 
of specific prohibition in the charter, "no denominational test will be imposed in 
the choice of trustees, officers, or teachers, or in the admission of students, nor will 
denominational tenets or doctrines be taught to the students." Upon the passage 
of such resolution by the governing bodies of such institutions, they may be recog- 
nized as entitled to the benefits of the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of 
Teaching, so far as considerations of sectarian control are concerned. 

The executive committee has ruled that the Foundation cannot accept the waiver by a denomi- 
national assembly of the right to confirm the election of the trustees of a college as equivalent to 
a legal abrogation of this provision in a college charter (November 12, 1908); that the election 
of the membei-s of a board of trustees by several constituencies, one of which is a denominational 
assembly or assemblies, the respective number of the trustees elected by each constituency, and 
therefore the control of the board, to be determined later by a by-law of the board, is a plan 
for collegiate government which falls within the prohibition of the charter of the Foundation 
(December 19, 1907) ; that the appointment of tlie trustees of a college, subject to confirmation 
by the board of education of a denomination, is within the prohibition of the charter of the Foun- 



4 < RULES 

dation (May 5, 1910); that the endowment of a professorship, to be held by a college so long as 
its president and a majority of its trustees are members of, or in doctrinal sympathy with, a spe- 
cified denomination, constitutes such a college, within the rules of the Foundation, a sectarian 
institution (June 21, 1906); that application to the Foundation for admission to the list of asso- 
ciated colleges, and the passage of the resolution certifying to undenominational status as required 
by the rules of the Foundation, create a relation which is inconsistent with the appearance of the 
name of the institution in an official list of denominational colleges and with the official indorse- 
ment of such colleges by denominational assemblies (January 23, 1907) ; that when the name 
of an associated college appears in a denominational publication, it should be put in a separate 
list from those under actual denominational control, under the caption: "The following institu- 
tions are not connected with the . . . Church by any legal ties, nor are they subject to its con- 
trol" (March 28, 1907); that an institution which appeals to a denomination for support on the 
grounds of its denominational standing is ineligible to the list of associated colleges, without 
regard to formal denominational status (November 15, 1906) ; that a proposed college charter 
which would read : "A majority of the faculty must be members of Protestant churches, but shall 
be so chosen that the members of no one church shall have a majority," is within the prohibition 
of the charter of the Foundation (April 9, 1908) ; that a college in which a minority of the trus- 
tees is elected by denominational assemblies, if conducted free from denominational partisanship, 
is eligible to participate in the retiring allowance system (January 20, 1910); and that the pro- 
fessors in the divinity school of an associated college, which is declared by the trustees of the 
college to be primarily designated for the education of candidates for the ministry of a specified 
denomination, are not eligible to the privileges of the retiring allowance system (July 26, 1906). 

DISCONTINUANCE 

The trustees of the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching reserve 
the right to discontinue the privilege of participation in the system of retiring 
allowances of the Foundation whenever, in the judgment of the trustees, an insti- 
tution ceases to conform to the regulations maintained by the trustees. Such with- 
drawal shall not, however, result in the discontinuance of retiring allowances already 
granted. 

The executive committee has ruled that the action of an associated college in passing a resolution 
that future elections of trustees shall be presented to a denominational assembly for confirmation 
is considered as a notification of the desire of the college to sever its relation with the Foimdation 
(September 30, 1909). 

RULES FOR THE GRANTING OF RETIRING ALLOWANCES 
Retiring allowances are granted in the colleges, universities, and technical schools 
on the associated list of the Foundation on two distinct grounds : (1) to a teacher of 
specified service on reaching the age of sixty-five ; (2) to a teacher after twenty-five 
years of service as professor, or thirty years of service as professor and instructor, in 
case of physical disability. 

The executive committee has ruled that a retiring allowance is granted under the rules in force 
at the date of granting, and an allowance is not increased or diminished by a subsequent change 
in the rules, even if the professor does not actually retire until after such change (May 2, 1907). 
Thus, professors cannot draw allowances upon the basis of the abrogated service rule of the Foun- 
dation, even if they had been eligible to retire under the rule when it was in force (June 9, 1910) ; 
and that if the grant of a retiring allowance is not followed within a reasonable time by actual 
retirement, the allowance must come before the executive committee as a new application (Octo- 
ber 8, 1907). 



RULES 5 

Rule 1. Any person sixty-five years of age who has had not less than fifteen years 
of service as a professor, or not less than twenty-five years of service as instructor or 
as instructor and professor, and who is at the time a professor or an instructor in an 
associated institution, shall be entitled to an annual retiring allowance computed 
as follows : 

(a) For an active pay of twelve hundred dollars^ or less, an allowance of one thou- 
sand dollars, provided no retiring allowance shall exceed ninety per cent of the active 
pay. 

(b) For an active pay greater than twelve hundred dollars, the retiring allowance 
shall equal one thousand dollars, increased by fifty dollars for each one hundred 
dollars of active pay in excess of twelve hundred dollars. 

(c) No retiring allowance shall exceed four thousand dollars. 

Retiring allowances based upon age are computed by the formula: R = -^-|-400, 
where R = annual retiring allowance and A = active pay. 

Instructors were made eligible to the benefits of the retiring allowance system by an amendment 
adopted by the trustees on November 18, 1908. An instructor is held to be a college or university 
teacher to whom is assigned independent teaching or responsibility for the conduct of laboratory 
work or of classes under the direction or supervision of a professor or head of a department. The 
term is not intended to include demonstrators, mechanicians, laboratory helpers, or other assistants 
who are not charged with the responsibility for the conduct of college classes, nor is it held to 
include those who give any considerable part of their time to gainful occupations other than col- 
lege teaching. The Foundation reserves the right to decide in all doubtful cases wliat constitutes 
service as an instructor. 

The executive committee has ruled that service as "emeritus professor" with salary may be 
counted (June 7, 1906) ; and that a demonstrator in a technical school does not hold a title repre- 
senting service equivalent to that of a permanent instructor (January 14, 1913). 

Rule 2. Any person who has had twenty -five years of service as professor, or 
thirty years of service as instructor and professor, and who is at the time either a 
professor or an instructor in an associated institution, shall, in the case of disability 
unfitting him for the work of a teacher as proved by medical examination, be entitled 
to a retiring allowance computed as follows : 

(a) For an active pay of twelve hundred dollars or less, a retiring allowance of 
eight hundred dollars, provided that no retiring allowance shall exceed eighty per cent 
of the active pay. 

(b) For an active pay greater than twelve hundred dollars, the retiring allowance 
shall equal eight hundred dollars, increased by forty dollars for each one hundred 
dollars in excess of twelve hundred dollars. 

(c) For each additional year of service above twenty-five for a professor, or above 
thirty for an instructor, the retiring allowance shall be increased by one per cent of 
the active pay. 

(d) No retiring allowance shall exceed four thousand dollars. 



' Ori^nally " sixteen ;" reduced to " twelve " on November 16, 1906. 



6 RULES 

Retiring allowances based on permanent disability are computed by the formula : 

A 
R=— — (b+15) + S20, where R = retiring allowance, A = active pay, and b = num- 
ber of years of service. 

The executive committee has ruled that a professor over sixty-five years of age cannot be retired 
upon an allowance according to this rule (June 9, 1910). 

The executive committee has ruled (April 20, 1911) that the policy of the Foundation is to grant 
temporary disability allowances only in cases of disability which are not supposed to be perma^ 
nent.On October 31, 1912, the committee voted that until further action on the part of the trustees, 
temporary retiring allowances shall not be granted. 

Rule 3. A widow who has been for ten years the wife of a teacher, who at the time 
of his death was in receipt of a retiring allowance, or who at the time of his death 
was eligible to a retiring allowance on the basis of age, or who had had twenty-five 
3'ears of service as a professor, or thirty years of service as an instructor and professor, 
shall receive as a pension one-half of the retiring allowance to which her husband 
was entitled under Rule 1, or to which he would have been entitled under Rule 2 in 
case of disability. 

The provision for widows was merely permissive until May 7, 1908, when the trustees made it 
mandatory. 

The executive committee has ruled that this rule does not apply to the widows of the recip- 
ients of a temporary disability allowance, whose service as a professor has been less than twenty- 
five years (December 19, 1907) ; and that the intention of the rules is that a pension to a widow 
shall cease upon her remarriage (February 6, 1908). 

Rule 4. In addition to the provision for retiring allowances made in Rules 1 and 2, 
the Foundation will cooperate with institutions on the associated list in the retirement 
of teachers who have had twenty -five years of service as professor, or thirty years of 
service as professor and instructor, but who, not being sixty-five years of age, are not 
eligible for retirement under Rule 1, upon the following basis: 

If the institution grants to such a teacher a retiring allowance at its own cost, the 
Foundation will consider such teacher eligible to a retiring allowance on reaching 
the age of sixty-five under the rules in force at that time, and at the same rate which 
the institution has paid in the interval, provided the retiring allowance so paid shall 
not be less than that to which the teacher would be entitled if he retired under 
Rule 2 on the ground of disability, and provided further that under no circum- 
stances will the Foundation pay a higher retiring allowance to such a teacher than 
that to which he would have been entitled had he remained in service until the age 
of sixty-five and retired under Rule 1. Should a teacher so retired by an institution 
die before reaching the age of sixty -five, his widow would be eligible under the rules 
to receive a pension from the Foundation equal to one-half of that which her hus- 
band had been receiving, provided that under no circumstances would such widow 
be entitled to a higher allowance than that which she would have received had her 
husband been retired under Rule 1 or Rule 2. 

Rule 5. In the preceding rules, years of leave of absence are to be counted as years 



RULES 7 

of service, but not exceeding one year in seven. Librarians, registrars, recorders, and 
administrative officers of long tenure whose salaries may be classed with those of 
professors and assistant professors are considered eligible to the benefits of the retiring 
allowance system. 

The executive committee has ruled that a superintendent of buildings is not eligible (Janu- 
ary 23, 1907) ; that assistant treasurers, assistant bursars, superintendents of grounds, and chief 
engineers are not eligible, nor the holder of the office designated as "head of a house" in women's 
colleges (January 20, 1910) ; that assistant librarians, occupying scholarly positions similar to those 
of assistant professors, are eligible (February 24, 1910) ; that in any one institution not more than 
one officer in the treasurer's department can be eligible (January 19, 1911) ; that a physical director 
of a college or university is not eligible unless he is an actual member of the faculty and a teacher of 
hygiene (November 15, 1911); and that the position of secretary to the president of a college or 
university does not render the holder eligible (November 15, 1911). 

Rule 6. Teachers in the professional departments of universities whose principal 
work is outside the profession of teaching are not included. 

Rule T. The benefits of the Foundation shall not be available to those whose active 
service ceased before April 16, 1905, the date of Mr. Carnegie's original letter to the 
trustees. 

The executive committee has ruled that it cannot waive this rule (November 15, 1906), and that 
it applies in the case of a professor who retired from active service before April 16, 1905, and who 
resumed teaching temporarily in order to qualify for a retiring allowance (October 8, 1907). 

Rule 8. In counting years of service toward a retiring allowance it is not necessary 
that the entire service shall have been given in institutions upon the associated list 
of the Foundation, but only years of service in an institution of higher education 
will be accepted as an equivalent. 

The executive committee has ruled that the president and the treasurer (May 9, 1906) and the 
secretary of the Carnegie Foundation (June 8, 1911) are within the privileges of the retiring al- 
lowance system ; that a limited period of service spent by a professor of an associated college in 
the American Classical School at Athens (March 28, 1907), the School of Classical Studies at Rome, 
the American School in Palestine, the Archaeological Institute of America (November 12, 1908), 
and the American Academy at Rome (April 29, 1918) will be counted in reckoning his retiring 
allowance ; that professors who may go from a college or university to engage in the work of sci- 
entific research under the Carnegie Institution of Washington may, in determining their retiring 
allowance, count years spent in research, whether for a longer or shorter time, as if spent in the 
work of a college professor (December 19, 1907); but that this privilege cannot be extended to 
those who begin with service in the Carnegie Institution of Washington, and later transfer to the 
service of an associated college (June 4, 1909) ; that the privileges of the retiring allowance system 
cannot be continued to professors who go for a limited number of years from colleges to scientific 
service under the United States government (October 19, 1911) ; and that service as the principal 
of an academy connected with an associated college cannot be counted (December 19, 1907). 

Rule 9. In reckoning the amount of the retiring allowance the average salary for 
the last five years of active service shall be considered the active pay. In case, how- 
ever, a professor agrees with his institution to continue at any time after reaching the 
age of sixty-five part time work for a diminished salary, he may do so, and upon his 
retirement his allowance shall be computed upon the basis of the last five years of 



8 RULES 

full pay. In the case of his death in this interval the pension of his widow shall be 
reckoned upon the same basis. 

In applying the rules for calculating retiring allowances the calculation shall be made to the 
nearest multiple of five above the actual value given by the rules (June 7, 1906). 

Allowances remain in force for thirty days after the death of the recipient (January 20, 1910). 

Rule 10. In no case shall any allowance be paid to a teacher who continues to give 
the whole or a part of his time to administration or teaching as a member of the 
instructing staff of any institution. This rule does not prevent the retired professor 
from having access to the laboratories of his institution, or from accepting compen- 
sation for occasional lectures ; but it does not permit him to assume stated academic 
duties. 

The executive committee has ruled that a retired professor cannot draw an allowance while 
acting in the capacity of advisory dean of a college, that is, supervising the installation and ar- 
rangements of courses and the selection of professors (May 5, 1910) ; and that a retired professor 
cannot teach in the summer school of the institution with which he was connected (April 20, 1910). 

Rule 11. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching retains the 
power to alter these rules in such manner as experience may indicate as desirable for 
the benefit of the whole body of teachers. 

RECOGNITION OF INDIVIDUAL PROFESSORS IN INSTITUTIONS NOT ON 
THE ASSOCIATED LIST 

The trustees realize that there are able and devoted teachers rendering admirable ser- 
vice to education in institutions which, o^ving to low entrance requirements, or for 
other reasons, are considered below the academic grade requisite to entitle them to 
a place on the associated list of institutions. Indi vidual professors of extraordinary 
merit or service in such institutions may be granted retiring aUowances, but in such 
cases the trustees will deal with the individual professor. Such allowances cannot in 
any instance be granted to professors in institutions deemed to be under denomi- 
national control. Inasmuch as the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of 
Teaching is a gift to higher education, service in a high school or academy will not 
entitle a teacher to a retiring allowance from this Foundation. 

The executive committee has ruled that upon the admission of an institution to the list of asso- 
ciated colleges, the amount of allowance heretofore granted to a professor in that institution may 
be increased to the amount fixed by the rules (April 9, 1908), and that it is inexpedient in the 
future to grant allowance outside of the associated colleges "except in cases of especial signifi- 
cance in institutions whose standards are so advanced that within a short time the institution will 
be ready to apply for admission to the Foundation" (May 5, 1910). 

These rules were approved at the annual meeting of the trustees of the Carnegie 
Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching held on November 19, 1913. 

(Attest) Charles F. Thwing, 

Secretary/ of the Board of Trustees. 



LIST OF ASSOCIATED INSTITUTIONS 



Amherst College 

Amherst, Massachusetts 

Bates College 
Lewiston, Maine 

Beloit College 
Beloit, Wisconsin 

BowDoiN College 
Brunswick, Maine 

University of CAiiFoaNiA 
Berkeley 

Carletok College 
Northfield, Minnesota 

Case School of Applied Science 
Cleveland, Ohio 

Central UNmsRsny of Kentucky 
Danville 

University of Cincinnati 
Cincinnati, Ohio 

Clark University 

Worcester, Massachusetts 

Thomas S. Clarkson Memorial College of 
Technology 
Potsdam, New York 

CoE College 

Cedar Rapids, Iowa 

Colorado College 
Colorado Springs 

Columbia University 
New York City 

Cornell University 
Ithaca, New York 

Dalhousie College and University 
Halifax, Nova Scotia 

Dartmouth College 

Hanover, New Hampshire 

Dickinson College 
Carlisle, Pennsylvania 

Drake Untvebsity 
Des Moines, Iowa 

Dhury College 
Springfield, Missouri 



Frankun College of Indiana 
Franklin 

Grinnell College 
Grinnell, Iowa 

Hamilton College 
Clinton, New York 

Harvard University 
Cambridge, Massachusetts 

HoBAHT College 
Geneva, New York 

Indiana University 
Bloomington 

Johns Hopkins University 
Baltimore, Maryland 

Knox College 
Galesburg, Illinois 

Lawrence College 
Appleton, Wisconsin 

Lehigh University 
South Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 

Leland Stanford Junior University 
Stanford University, C/alifornia 

McGiLL University 
Montreal, Quebec 

Marietta College 
Marietta, Ohio 

Massachusetts Institute of Technology 
Boston 

University of Michigan 
Ann Arbor 

Middlebury College 
Middlebury, Vermont 

University of Minnesota 
Minneapolis 

University of Missouri 
Columbia 

Mount Holyoke College 
South Hadley, Massachusetts 

New York University 
New York City 

Oberlin College 
Oberlin, Ohio 



•f] 1B!4 



10 



ASSOCIATED INSTITUTIONS 



University of Pennsylvania 
Philadelphia 

University of Pittsbuiigh 
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 

Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn 
Brooklyn, New York 

Princeton University 
Princeton, New Jersey 

Purdue University 
Lafayette, Indiana 

Radcliffe College 
Cambridge, Massachusetts 

Rensselaer Polytechnic Instttdte 
Troy, New York 

RiPON College 
Ripon, Wisconsin 

University of Rochester 
Rochester, New York 

Rose Polytechnic Institute 
Terre Haute, Indiana 

Smith College 

Northampton, Massachusetts 

Stevens Institute of Technology 
Hoboken, New Jersey 

SwARTHJIORE CoLLEGE 

Swarthmore, Pennsylvania 

University of Toronto 
Toronto, Ontario 

Trinity" Coixege 
Hartford, Connecticut 

Tufts College 
Tufts College, Massachusetts 



TuLANE University of Louisiana 
New Orleans 

Union University 
Schenectady, New York 

Vassar College 

Poughkeepsie, New York 

University of Vermont 
Burlington 

University of Vihginia 
Charlottesville 

Wabash College 

Crawfordsville, Indiana 

Washington and Jefferson College 
Washington, Pennsylvania 

Washington University 
St. Louis, Missouri 

Wellesley College 
Wellesley, Massachusetts 

Wells College 
Aurora, New York 

Wesley AN University 
Middletown, Connecticut 

Western Reserve University 
Cleveland, Ohio 

Williams College 
Williamstown, Massachusetts 

University of Wisconsin 
Madison 

Worcester Polytechnic Institute 
Worcester, Massachusetts 

Yale University 

New Haven, Connecticut 



November, 1913. 



